<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    <title>Jim Barcelona's Philosophy and Food Blog - Ethics</title>
    <link>http://www.cyphgen.com/philo/</link>
    <description>A Blog about Philosophy and Food</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.0.1 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 01:36:02 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>Should I clone my dead pet?</title>
    <link>http://www.cyphgen.com/philo/archives/10-Should-I-clone-my-dead-pet.html</link>
            <category>Ethics</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.cyphgen.com/philo/archives/10-Should-I-clone-my-dead-pet.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.cyphgen.com/philo/wfwcomment.php?cid=10</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.cyphgen.com/philo/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=10</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (barce)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    There&#039;s an interesting article over at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cyphgen.com/philo/exit.php?url_id=139&amp;amp;entry_id=10&quot; title=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://www.sfgate.com/&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot;&gt;SF Gate&lt;/a&gt; on a Texan who spent $50,000 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cyphgen.com/philo/exit.php?url_id=140&amp;amp;entry_id=10&quot; title=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/12/23/CATS.TMP&quot;  onmouseover=&quot;window.status=&#039;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/12/23/CATS.TMP&#039;;return true;&quot; onmouseout=&quot;window.status=&#039;&#039;;return true;&quot;&gt;to clone her dead cat&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here&#039;s how the article ends:&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;I can completely sympathize with people who become so attached to their pet that they want to bring it back at any cost, but there is nothing that can bring that animal back,&quot; Magnus said.&quot; Attempting to do so is unhealthy. It&#039;s trying to pretend that death doesn&#039;t exist, which speaks to a larger symptom in our culture of not dealing with death. It&#039;s better to just move on. There is no good reason why anybody would do this.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a good reason for cloning a pet? 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2004 08:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cyphgen.com/philo/archives/10-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>